Final answer:
Unable to fully answer the original incomplete question about opinions on King Henry IV Part 1 by William Shakespeare but provided a general interpretation of Shakespearean plays and discussed opinions on modern adaptations and edited versions used in schools.
Step-by-step explanation:
The original question appears to be incomplete as it references a view but does not specify what that view is. Therefore, it's not possible to agree or disagree with it in the context of King Henry IV Part 1 by William Shakespeare. However, I can provide insights into common interpretations of the play and how they might align or conflict with various critical perspectives. For instance, discussing if Prince Hal's transformation is genuine could align with discussing the complexities of characters that Shakespeare often portrays. His plays, including this history play, explore deep conflicts within characters and the society they inhabit. If the question pertains to this kind of interpretation or another specific critical analysis, please provide further details for a more tailored response.
Regarding modern takes of Shakespeare's plays, opinions can vary. Some purists who prefer Original Practices might find modern adaptations to be unnecessary departures from Shakespeare's intentions, while others might see them as fresh means to keep the Bard's works alive and relevant for contemporary audiences. Each adaptation, whether faithful to the original setting or reimagined in a modern context, offers an opportunity to engage with the text in new light.
In schools, using edited and translated versions of Shakespeare's works can be seen as a way to make the text more accessible to students. However, some may argue that this detracts from experiencing the richness of the original language and poetic devices employed by Shakespeare. It's a balancing act between maintaining authenticity and ensuring comprehension.