The key difference between the Haitian Revolution and those in British North America and France is that the Haitian Revolution was a slave rebellion that led to an independent black state. Malcolm Gladwell's article argues that social media has limitations in driving political change. The Davies-J curve is a social theory that describes the conditions under which revolutions are more likely to occur.
The question asks what was a key difference between the Haitian Revolution and those in British North America and France. One significant distinction is that the Haitian Revolution was a successful slave rebellion that led to the formation of the first independent black state in the Americas, setting it apart from the other revolutions which were mainly driven by a desire for political independence and were not primarily slave revolts.
Another aspect to consider is the influence of social media on political change. Author Malcolm Gladwell in his article, discusses the limitations of social media in creating substantive political change, contrasting it with the real-world activism and engagement that typically drive successful revolutions.
James C. Davies' theory suggests that revolutions are more likely to occur not when people are in absolute poverty but when there is a significant discrepancy between what people have come to expect and what they are actually experiencing. This is known as the Davies-J curve, and it plays a significant role in understanding the social dynamics that can lead to a revolution.
The question probably maybe:
What key distinctions set the Haitian Revolution apart from the revolutions in British North America and France, and how do Malcolm Gladwell's views on social media, as discussed in his article, challenge common perceptions about its effectiveness in driving political change? Additionally, how does James C. Davies' theory, particularly the Davies-J curve, provide insights into the conditions under which revolutions are more likely to occur?