Final answer:
Employee experiences at Amazon, such as the Minnesota worker protest and warehouse employee reviews, raise questions about its organizational ethics. Applying theories like Kantian ethics and Utilitarianism provides a framework for assessing the respect for worker autonomy and overall utility of Amazon's labor practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
When examining employee experiences at Amazon and applying organizational ethics theories, two examples that might be highlighted are first, the protest by around two hundred Amazon workers in December 2018 in Shakopee, Minnesota against working conditions such as computer tracking and required high rates of speed.
A second example is an employee review stating that after three years of work in an Amazon Warehouse in the USA, the management is said to be 'very bad', with no opportunities for progress, highlighting the physical toll with at least 25000 steps walked per shift.
Normative ethical theories, such as Kantian ethics and Utilitarianism, can be applied to analyze Amazon's treatment of its workers. Kantian ethics would focus on the respect for the workers as autonomous individuals, and whether the company's policies consider the inherent dignity of each worker.
On the other hand, Utilitarianism would evaluate the ethicality based on the overall happiness or utility generated by Amazon's practices - weighing the benefits to the consumers and company against the detriments to employee well-being.
Despite Amazon's position as a leader in market innovation and advantage in economies of scale, ethical considerations about labor conditions are crucial for evaluating how ethically Amazon treats its workers.