Final answer:
Construction schedules played a critical role in evaluating the Minmar case's delay claim, determining if and how the delays affected the project timeline.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Minmar case, construction schedules were pivotal to the assessment of the delay claim. These schedules showcased the planned sequence and duration of construction tasks, which were foundational in evaluating any deviations and the impact of delays on project completion. Construction schedules in such cases are typically prepared using a critical path method (CPM), which is a step-by-step project management technique for process planning that defines critical and non-critical tasks.
The schedules are dynamic documents, often created at the outset of a project and regularly updated to reflect actual progress versus planned progress. Evidence of changes, delays, and the corresponding impacts on the project's timeline from these schedules is instrumental in determining the cause and effect relationship of the delay.