Final answer:
NAWSA pursued women's suffrage through state campaigns and traditional lobbying, while the NWP, under Alice Paul, used direct, confrontational tactics and aimed for a constitutional amendment. These differences in strategy and approach significantly marked the contrasts between the two organizations in the suffrage movement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) and the National Woman's Party (NWP) were two organizations with differing strategies and tactics in the fight for women's suffrage in the United States. While NAWSA favored a more conservative approach with a state-by-state strategy, the NWP, led by Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, was known for its more militant stance and focused on a constitutional amendment for women's suffrage. Moreover, the NWP utilized confrontational tactics like protests, picketing, and hunger strikes, setting it apart from NAWSA's more traditional lobbying and petitioning methods.
The efforts of the NWP made groups like NAWSA appear more moderate and reasonable by comparison, helping to shift public opinion and eventually contributing to the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1919. Alice Paul's NWP particularly highlighted women's equality as the heart of the suffrage issue, in contrast to NAWSA's initial approach of promoting the vote as a means to uplift politics and counterbalance the votes of immigrants.