Final answer:
The taking of indigenous homelands in the west was similar to the Atlantic seaboard in that both involved displacement of native peoples due to European and American expansion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The taking of indigenous homelands in the west was both similar to and different from the taking of lands along the Atlantic seaboard. On the eastern seaboard, the European colonists encountered native tribes as they established colonies, building permanent structures that restricted the movements of the native tribes, leading to conflict. The introduction of European goods and weapons also disrupted indigenous life and shifted power dynamics between tribes. Meanwhile, in the Great Plains, the U.S. government often negotiated treaties that were quickly broken, resulting in the forced removal of Native Americans. The westward expansion was also driven by the desire for land, influenced by developments such as the Homestead Act, railroads, and new agricultural practices.
The notion of land ownership differed vastly, as native peoples did not subscribe to individual land ownership, while settlers did. Conflicts often ensued due to these fundamentally different views and desires. Additionally, the experiences of Native Americans varied across different regions, and their resistance sometimes led to military conflicts, wherein brutal clashes were often initiated by settlers. Policies such as the Indian Removal Act and the Allotment System disrupted indigenous ways of life profoundly. Both eastern and western expansions resulted in the displacement of native peoples, but the specifics of each process were shaped by the context of the era and the policies enacted at the time.