Final answer:
During the French and Indian War, the handling of ammunition and cannons varied by situation. Strategic use of such supplies sometimes led to significant consequences, such as the British withdrawal from Boston.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the actions of soldiers in terms of ammunition and cannons at forts during the French and Indian War. In several instances throughout the war, strategic positioning and supply issues had significant impacts. For instance, during a notable moment in the war, colonial forces positioned cannons on hills overlooking British positions and Boston Harbor, which forced the British to withdraw from Boston in 1776 due to their inability to return effective fire.
However, the war also had moments where troops behaved in panic, such as in the 1755 Battle of the Monongahela, where British and colonial troops displayed what was perceived as cowardice under ambush by French and Native American forces. In the aftermath of the war, British troops took over the French forts and were often not well-received by local tribes, partly due to a reduction in ammunition and gunpowder sales that weakened relationships.
Overall, the handling of ammunition and cannons varied depending on the situation. While not all details about the abandonment of ammunition and cannons at forts are specified, the French and Indian War featured several incidences where the management of these supplies was crucial to the outcomes of engagements and the subsequent relationships with Native American tribes.