Final answer:
The Supreme Court has generally found that certain content restrictions, including obscenity and defamation, violate the First Amendment. Speech can be reasonably limited in certain places, and the freedom of expression rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court has generally found that certain content restrictions violate the First Amendment. For example, obscenity and defamation are not protected by the First Amendment. Additionally, speech can be reasonably limited in certain places such as public libraries, courtrooms, public schools, and jails in the interests of order and decorum. The First Amendment also provides somewhat limited freedom of expression rights to children attending public schools.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has generally upheld the ability of the press to print or broadcast messages and images of its choice, with exceptions for obscenity and defamation. In cases involving subversive speech, the First Amendment protects abstract discussions of overthrowing the government without specific actions to accomplish it. The Court has also ruled that public display of offensive speech can only be criminalized with a more specific and compelling reason than a general tendency to disturb the peace.
The struggle to find a balance between religious liberty and government regulation has also been a prominent issue in First Amendment cases. The Court has had to determine which religious activities are protected and which may be limited if they harm other individuals or society.