Final answer:
Citizen science databases have pitfalls such as unreliable volunteer-collected data and the risk of unrepresentativeness, but also offer benefits like pattern recognition and public engagement in science. Internet access and social media use bring challenges like the digital divide and security risks, which can be mitigated through improved security and access.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the pitfalls of a citizen science generated database, one must acknowledge issues such as the collection of superficial data, potential unrepresentativeness of the information, and the risk of eroding the credibility of conservation science. These challenges can arise from a lack of training or expertise among volunteers, leading to data that may not be reliable for scientific purposes. On the other hand, the benefits of citizen science include the ability to analyze large datasets with the unique capabilities of the human eye for recognizing patterns, the democratization of science, and the engagement of the public in scientific endeavors, as demonstrated by the successful Galaxy Zoo project.
The negative consequences of ease of internet access and widespread reliance on social media include the digital divide, increased security risks such as loss of privacy and system failures, and the increased vulnerability due to technological dependence. These effects can be mitigated by improving online security measures, increasing digital literacy, and ensuring equitable access to technology to bridge the digital divide.