Final answer:
Garrison viewed the U.S. Constitution as a pro-slavery document and believed the Union should be dissolved, whereas Douglass saw the Constitution as anti-slavery and thought it could be used to end slavery without dissolving the Union.
Step-by-step explanation:
Primary Differences in Beliefs between Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison
William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass were two prominent figures in the abolitionist movement, but they had significant differences in their beliefs regarding the U.S. Constitution and the Union. Garrison believed the Constitution was a pro-slavery document and advocated for the dissolution of the Union in order to end slavery. He considered the Constitution 'a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell' due to its compromises that allowed for slavery and asserted that there should be 'no union with slaveholders.' Conversely, other abolitionists, including Fredrick Douglass, believed that the Constitution was essentially anti-slavery and could be used within the existing political system to abolish slavery. Douglass did not support the dissolution of the Union but rather sought to utilize its Constitution to make abolition a reality. This divergence in interpretation and strategy was a significant aspect of the ideological rift within the abolitionist movement.