Final answer:
Meyer's examples of lying body language potentially partially align with the module content, acknowledging some matching points and some that may differ, especially since body language interpretation is influenced by individual and cultural differences.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student question regarding whether Meyer's examples of lying body language align with module content suggests a partial alignment, meaning some aspects may correlate while others might not. Meyer's focus on eye contact could be interpreted differently depending on the context presented in the module. For example, the module content implies that body language provides additional meaning to verbal communication, which can include facial expressions, gestures, and movement. These can be indicators of deceit, but they're not definitive because different cultures and individuals express themselves in various ways. Thus, Meyer's examples would only align with the module to the extent that they consider these variables.
More so, the module stresses the significance of considering how emotions are expressed through body language which can vary widely between individuals. This implies that there is not a one-size-fits-all set of indicators for lying, which may or may not align with Meyer's generalized examples. In fact, both sources would agree that a person's posture and movement could offer insights into their emotional state and possibly their truthfulness. It is important, however, to understand that these are cues, not conclusive proof.