32.1k views
4 votes
Which of the following correctly justifies statement 4 of the two-column proof?

Lines JK and LM are intersected by transversal JL; the intersection of JK and JL creates angles 2, 4, 3, and 1 clockwise beginning at the top right; the intersection of LM and JL creates angles 6, 8, 7, and 5 clockwise beginning at the top right.

Given: JK ∥ LM

Prove: ∠ 2 ≅ ∠ 7

A. Corresponding Angles Theorem

B. Transitive Property of Equality

C. Vertical Angles Theorem

D. Substitution Property of Equality

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The correct theorem to justify that angle 2 is congruent to angle 7 when lines JK and LM are intersected by transversal JL is the Corresponding Angles Theorem.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student has described a scenario where lines JK and LM are intersected by transversal JL, creating angles labeled 1 through 8. Given that lines JK and LM are parallel (JK ∥ LM), and we are to prove that ∠ 2 is congruent to ∠ 7 (∠ 2 ≅ ∠ 7), we need to determine which theorem justifies that ∠ 2 is congruent to ∠ 7 based on the described intersecting lines and angles.

The correct justification for statement 4, which asserts that ∠ 2 is congruent to ∠ 7, is the Corresponding Angles Theorem. This theorem states that when two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, the corresponding angles are congruent. In this case, ∠ 2 and ∠ 7 are corresponding angles because they are in the same relative position at each intersection where the transversal (JL) cuts the parallel lines (JK and LM).

User Mat Jones
by
8.0k points