Question

Say that you are a researcher exploring whether or not citizens from less populous states receive better senatorial representation than those from the most populous states. How might you define better? What evidence would you look for to form your hypothesis?

A) You might define better by the number of senators each state has, and you would look for statistical data on population size and senatorial representation.

B) You might define better by the level of satisfaction citizens express in surveys, and you would look for survey responses from citizens in different states.

C) You might define better by the economic development of each state, and you would look for economic indicators and senatorial representation.

D) You might define better by the educational attainment of citizens, and you would look for educational data and senatorial representation.

Answer 1

In this research study, 'better' can be defined by the number of senators each state has, and researchers can use statistical data on population size and senatorial representation to form a hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this research study on senatorial representation, the definition of 'better' can vary depending on the aspect being evaluated. Option A suggests defining 'better' by the number of senators each state has, and looking for statistical data on population size and senatorial representation. This approach analyzes the disparity in representation based on population sizes.

Using statistical data, researchers can compare the number of senators from less populous states to those from the most populous states to determine if there is unequal representation. By examining the population size and senatorial representation, researchers can form a hypothesis based on the evidence they find.