Final answer:
The Declaration of Sentiments and the Pearl Harbor Speech make persuasive arguments using different techniques and appeals. Stanton's argument focuses on women's rights, while Roosevelt's argument centers around the need for the US to enter World War II. Both authors use evidence and logical reasoning to support their claims.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Declaration of Sentiments and the Pearl Harbor Speech are both influential documents that make persuasive arguments. The Declaration of Sentiments, written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton in 1848, argued for women's rights and equality. Stanton used techniques such as invoking historical documents like the Declaration of Independence, using logical reasoning, and appealing to emotions. On the other hand, Franklin D. Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech delivered in 1941, aimed to inform and persuade Congress to declare war against Japan. Roosevelt used rhetorical devices, vivid descriptions, and emotional appeals to convey the seriousness of the situation and convince the audience of the need for war.
When comparing the arguments presented in these documents, both authors employ persuasive techniques, but they differ in terms of their subject matter and intended audience. Stanton's argument in The Declaration of Sentiments revolves around the fight for women's rights, while Roosevelt's argument in the Pearl Harbor Speech focuses on the need for the United States to enter World War II after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Both authors use evidence and logical reasoning to support their claims, but Stanton's argument is more rooted in appeals to equality and justice, whereas Roosevelt's argument heavily relies on patriotism and the necessity of defending the nation.