Final answer:
Black's view sees the interplay between objectivity and subjectivity as one where personal biases can shape perceived truths, though strategies exist to strive towards objectivity such as abstracting from personal experience and recognizing goal-based objective morality. However, some postmodern theories challenge the very existence of objective truth.
Step-by-step explanation:
How Black sees the relationship between objectivity and subjectivity is multifaceted, involving a recognition that subjective realities can indeed shape the development of events in ways originally not supported by objective reality. In an effort to strive for objectivity, it is important to abstract from specific circumstances and experiences. This helps reduce the bias that comes from one's personal, subjective viewpoint, which may not accurately represent wider societal structures and truths. Additionally, the notion of value neutrality in sociological studies suggests that while complete objectivity may be unachievable, awareness, and acknowledgment of potential biases can help approximate a factual perspective. Furthermore, philosophical debates such as John Locke's exploration of primary and secondary qualities illustrate the challenges in distinguishing between the innate properties of objects and the subjective perceptions present in the mind.
Some approaches, such as the concept of telos, argue for an objective morality based on the fulfillment of certain goals or purposes. However, postmodern perspectives, like those of Rorty, cast doubt on the existence of objective truths, suggesting that truth is a social construct influenced by power dynamics rather than being rooted in objective reality. Such perspectives highlight the tension between objectivity and subjectivity in determining what is considered to be true or real.