201k views
0 votes
The author's use of symbolism and imagery suggests that Britain's assertion of its right to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER,' is

A. evil
B. ridiculous
C. inevitable
D. doomed to failure

User Blucz
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The assertion by Britain to 'bind us in all cases whatsoever' is symbolically portrayed as evil, reflecting historical sentiments from the American Revolution where absolute control was equated with moral reprehensibility and tyranny.

Step-by-step explanation:

The author's use of symbolism and imagery when stating Britain's assertion of its right 'to bind us in all cases whatsoever' strongly suggests that Britain's control is viewed as evil. This phrasing echoes sentiments from the American Revolution, where the colonies viewed the British claim to absolute authority as not just oppressive but morally reprehensible.

Works like Thomas Paine's 'The American Crisis' characterize this level of control as slavery, equating it with a lack of humanity and divine impropriety. In this context, the assertion of unlimited power by Britain is tied to a larger historical framework of resistance against tyranny, where such absolute claims were resisted and ultimately overthrown, underscoring the suggestion of evil.

User Teamnorge
by
7.6k points