Final answer:
The claim regarding the federal government screening political information online is false. The U.S. government does not pre-screen political content for accuracy, though there are some regulations in specific instances.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'The federal government screens political information on the Internet to ensure that all information delivered to the public is accurate' is false. The federal government does not routinely screen information for accuracy before it is published on the Internet. While there are certain regulatory measures in place for specific scenarios, the vast majority of political content is generated and shared by individuals, organizations, and media entities without prior government approval.
Regarding the given exercises and information:
- Public opinion serves multiple purposes; it allows elected officials to understand public desires, gives the public a platform to express their opinions, and can be influenced by elites, making the answer 'e. All of the above'.
- The statement that 'During ratification debates, the Antifederalists were really Federalists' is false. The Antifederalists and Federalists were two distinct groups with opposing views on the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
- The 'necessary and proper' clause has historically been used to expand the power of the national government rather than limit it, making the statement false.
- The Sedition Act of 1798 was designed to smother political opposition, not to safeguard civil liberties.
It's also important to note the role of social media in political information dissemination and participation, which highlights the challenges of misinformation and the importance of governmental transparency and freedom of information for a democratic society.