224k views
0 votes
Malcolm X gives examples of how the marchers are acting only according to instructions. Which of his examples make a case and which do not?

A) The examples are not provided for assessment.
B) All examples make a compelling case.
C) Only a few examples make a case.
D) None of the examples make a convincing case.

User Puja Surya
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The provided examples illustrate diverse strategies within the Civil Rights Movement but do not directly address Malcolm X's view on following instructions. Malcolm X's call for immediate action contrasts with the nonviolent, more disciplined approaches of leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and John Lewis.

Step-by-step explanation:

To evaluate whether Malcolm X's examples effectively make a case for acting only according to instructions during the Civil Rights Movement marches, we must consider how these actions contrasted with other leaders. Malcolm X advocated for immediate action rather than gradual change, distinguishing his approach from nonviolent strategies of leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and John Lewis.

While the examples provided may illustrate different tactics within the Civil Rights Movement, they do not directly address Malcolm X's perspective on following instructions. The examples of John Lewis and King illustrate a commitment to nonviolent demonstrations, which included following certain directives to maintain discipline and ensure safety. Conversely, Malcolm X's philosophy deviated from this approach, endorsing more direct and even aggressive forms of action.

Therefore, without specific instances from Malcolm X, we cannot accurately assess whether his examples make a compelling case for or against following instructions. The examples illustrate the diversity of strategies within the Civil Rights Movement but do not directly support or refute Malcolm X's stance.

User Omkar Rajam
by
8.6k points