Final answer:
Anaya uses pathos to appeal to the reader's sense of fairness by discussing everyone's right to read what they choose. Additionally, his credibility is established through ethos, and appeal to logic, logos, could be through presenting documented facts about censors' motivations.
Step-by-step explanation:
How does Anaya use rhetorical appeal to convince readers that censors want to limit what people can read? Among the options, Anaya's use of pathos, or the emotional appeal, can be seen in how he speaks about everyone's right to read what they choose, which aims to appeal to the reader's sense of fairness.
This method connects to the audience's shared values and emotions, thus persuading them about the negative impacts of censorship on individual freedom. This approach is effective because it resonates with the readers' beliefs in fairness and autonomy.
Moreover, by discussing his lifelong love of reading, Anaya establishes his credibility (ethos), and talking about documented facts on censors' motivations would appeal to the readers' sense of logic (logos).
As Anaya refrains from stating a direct opinion, he allows readers to form their own view based on a rounded representation of the facts, which shows thorough consideration for the rhetorical situation and the audience.