Question

We have learned about two dimensional technique of printmaking, and drawing and painting. In this discussion board we will contrast these three techniques. Post an artist's drawing, print or painting. What are some of the ways the drawing, painting and printmaking techniques differ in their history and development? Why would an artist prefer one technique over another? There were distinct reasons for using each technique, what are those and what effect do they have on the aesthetics of the art work? Think of these in terms of the formal qualities.

Answer 1

Drawing, painting, and printmaking differ in their history, techniques, and aesthetics. Artists may prefer one technique over another based on factors such as expressiveness, color possibilities, or the ability to create multiples.

Step-by-step explanation:

In terms of history and development, drawing, painting, and printmaking have different origins and techniques. Drawing is one of the oldest art forms, dating back to prehistoric times, and it involves creating lines or marks on a surface using various tools.

Painting, on the other hand, emerged later in ancient civilizations and involves applying color to a surface using brushes or other implements. Printmaking is a technique that developed much later, with different processes such as relief, intaglio, and lithography.

An artist may prefer one technique over another based on various factors. Drawing allows for direct expression and exploration of ideas, with great flexibility and immediacy.