Final answer:
The recent fire in a Colaba guest house highlights the lack of elementary precautions against fire hazards in the city. The fire was not as destructive because it broke out when most guests were out. The author criticizes the municipal staff for not doing their duty and highlights architects as professionals society looks up to for guidance and norms.
Step-by-step explanation:
The recent fire in a Colaba guest house highlights the fact that elementary precautions against fire hazards are not being taken in the city. The passage describes how the rooms in the guest house are poorly constructed without proper ventilation, windows, and separate exits.
Fortunately, the fire broke out in the afternoon when most guests were out, preventing a greater tragedy.
The fire could not prove as destructive as it could have been because it broke out in the afternoon and most of the guests were out. If it had happened when people were inside, the poisonous fumes from the synthetic material within could have suffocated and killed many.
The fire could have also spread to the entire building with its old wooden beams and staircases.
The author states that clearly the municipal staff is not doing its duty because they are negligent and not particular about safety measures. The author also mentions that such firetraps endanger the lives of the firefighting staff. This points to a lack of proper oversight and enforcement of fire-safety norms by the municipal staff.
In the passage, the author mentions that society looks up to architects for guidance and norms. This implies that architects are considered professionals to be followed for their expertise in building design and safety.
The word closest in meaning to 'scandalous' in the passage is disgraceful. The passage describes the firetraps as endangering lives and suggests that the lack of fire safety measures is a cause for concern and disgrace.