Final answer:
The interpretation of the Second Amendment is controversial. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for self-defense within the home. Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to have a sawed-off double barrel shotgun would depend on its necessity for self-defense.
Step-by-step explanation:
The interpretation of the Second Amendment has caused controversy in America. While some argue that the amendment guarantees individuals the right to own guns, others interpret it as a protection for the right of states to form a well-regulated militia. In the landmark case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for self-defense within the home. Therefore, whether the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to have a sawed-off double barrel shotgun would likely depend on whether such a firearm is considered necessary for self-defense within the home, which would be subject to legal interpretation.