Final answer:
Verifying the ethical use of rhetorical appeals is not a technique used by readers to analyze arguments; it's a writer's consideration. This choice is the correct response to the question about a technique that is not used by an engaged reader in analyzing an argument. The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which of the listed techniques is not a method an engaged reader can use to analyze an argument. To analyze an argument effectively, an engaged reader might assess and reflect on the essay’s conclusion, identify the thesis and restate it in their own words, identify the variety of modes the writer uses, and examine the use of rhetorical strategies and evaluate their effectiveness.
However, verifying the ethical use of rhetorical appeals is not typically classified as a technique used by readers to analyze arguments, but rather a consideration for writers to ensure their argument is ethically sound. Therefore, this answer choice is the correct one.
Readers can engage with an argument by looking at key elements such as the claim, reasoning, evidence, and the overall rhetorical situation that influences the effectiveness of the argument. A rhetorical analysis requires careful examination of the author's use of rhetorical devices such as parallelism.
Repetition, rhetorical questions, and acknowledgment of counterclaims. Additionally, fallacious reasoning and unethical persuasive techniques such as ad hominem attacks or bandwagon appeals should be noted as they detract from the logical thought process expected in a sound argument. The correct option is D.