Final answer:
The argument supporting the attractiveness of imagination over reality is that imagination permits limitless creative freedom compared to reality's limitations. Creative fields illustrate this, reflecting the belief that mental constructs may sometimes surpass physical reality in their significance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Imagination vs. Reality in Creative Works
The argument that supports the notion that the world of imagination is more attractive than the world of reality is A. Imagination allows for unlimited possibilities and creative freedom, while reality often presents limitations and boundaries. This is illustrated through various creative fields such as playwriting, where designers can explore a wider range of creative choices in fantasy productions, although it can also bring challenges in unifying these limitless choices into a coherent world.
Moreover, fiction writers enjoy a vast expanse of creative space, unencumbered by the factual constraints that nonfiction writers must adhere to, which shows the lure of imagination. Philosophical discussions, like those of Plato's idealism, further suggest that some believe the mental constructs of imagination can possess a more profound 'reality' than the physical world, as seen in our conception of geometric ideals, like the perfect circle that cannot be found in the material world.
The attractiveness of imagination also feeds into human ambition and innovation. It is the realm where both personal and societal aspirations can extend beyond the immediate physical limitations. Yet, the question remains: What truly holds more value, ideas existing solely in the mind, or those realized in both the mind and the tangible world?