Question

What would count as evidence against each hypothesis? Of what, in fact, would you have to convince each person?

a. Presenting alternative interpretations
b. Providing contradictory data
c. Highlighting inconsistencies
d. Ignoring relevant information

Answer 1

To counter a hypothesis, one might present alternative interpretations, provide contradictory data, or highlight inconsistencies in the evidence. Ignoring relevant information is not a sound scientific method and is not useful in disproving a hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Evidence Against Hypotheses

To counter a hypothesis, one must present evidence that shows it is unlikely to be true. This can involve various methods:

• Presenting alternative interpretations of the data which suggest different conclusions.
• Providing contradictory data that directly disputes the predictions made by the hypothesis.
• Highlighting inconsistencies within the data that may suggest the hypothesis does not fully explain the observations.
• Ignoring relevant information is not a method for disproving a hypothesis; in fact, this may weaken an argument as it suggests an incomplete analysis.

Hypothesis testing in Biology, often involves gathering and interpreting data from experiments or observations to support or refute a scientific hypothesis. If the evidence doesn't align with the hypothesis, this can lead to its rejection or revision.