Question

Reference your notes and the provided documents to write a three- to four-paragraph essay that describes how these two primary-source historical documents form their respective arguments. Compare and contrast the key points, main ideas, and arguments presented in the documents. Make sure your essay addresses the following questions: What techniques do the authors use to form their arguments? Is there any evidence of bias or stereotypes? Using the author-date system, make sure to cite your sources properly with in-text citations as well as a works cited page for any information you use from outside sources, including the two provided documents. When you have finished, reread the essay to check for all of the points above, and then proofread it to be sure your work does not contain errors in grammar or spelling. (It’s about the 1968 Democratic Convention and its bosses and about The Letter from National Mobilization Committee to End the War on Vietnam. Pls write 3 paragraphs.)

a) True
b) False

Answer 1

The two primary-source historical documents have different arguments regarding the 1968 Democratic Convention and the war in Vietnam. The authors use techniques like historical context and persuasive language, and there may be some bias or stereotypes present.

Step-by-step explanation:

The two primary-source historical documents, the 1968 Democratic Convention and its bosses, and The Letter from National Mobilization Committee to End the War on Vietnam, present different arguments regarding the convention and the war. The authors use various techniques to form their arguments, such as providing historical context, using persuasive language, and presenting evidence. In terms of bias or stereotypes, there may be some evident in both documents, as the authors express their perspectives and opinions. Proper citations using the author-date system should be included in the essay.