Question

What could Brutus have done to give a more effective speech?

A) Incorporate more emotional appeals
B) Use fewer rhetorical devices
C) Provide more factual evidence
D) Avoid addressing the audience directly

ii. Comparing Brutus's and Antony's speeches, which persuasive appeal did Brutus emphasize?
A) Ethos (Credibility)
B) Logos (Logic)
C) Pathos (Emotion)
D) Kairos (Timing)
Contrasting Brutus's and Antony's speeches, what rhetorical device did Brutus use that Antony did not?
A) Anaphora
B) Irony
C) Hyperbole
D) Alliteration

Answer 1

Brutus could have incorporated more emotional appeals (pathos) to make his speech more effective compared to Antony's. Brutus emphasized logos, relying on logic and reasoning, while he used hyperbole as a rhetorical device, unlike Antony.

Step-by-step explanation:

When evaluating what could have made Brutus's speech more effective, A) Incorporate more emotional appeals would be a plausible suggestion. An effective speech often balances the appeal to logic with a strong appeal to the audience's emotions, known as pathos. In comparing Brutus's and Antony's speeches, Brutus emphasized B) Logos (Logic), which involves credible information and reasons presented as evidence. While Antony chose to stir the audience's emotions, Brutus relied more on the strength of his arguments to persuade.

Contrasting the oratory skills of Brutus and Antony, a key rhetorical device that Brutus used, which Antony did not, was C) Hyperbole. Brutus tended to exaggerate to make his case against Caesar being a threat to Rome's freedom, while Antony applied a more subtle approach, using irony and allowing the audience to draw conclusions.