Final answer:
The creationist argument relevant to the question is that the human eye is too complex to have evolved naturally (option A). However, evolutionary biology contends that the human eye's complexity can be explained by natural selection, which gradually selects for beneficial traits over successive generations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The complexity and perfection of the human eye is a frequent point of discussion in the debate between creationists and proponents of evolutionary theory. The argument put forth by creationists that is relevant to the question is: A) The human eye is too complex to have evolved naturally. This argument is a part of the Intelligent Design Theory which suggests that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
On the other side of the argument, evolutionary biology provides explanations for the complexity of the human eye, addressing how incremental changes over long periods of time via natural selection can lead to complex organs. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution posits that natural selection results from the persistence and spread of selected, heritable changes (beneficial traits) through successive generations in a population. This process explains the development and diversification of species without implying the necessity of an intelligent designer.