Final answer:
The removal of the Robert E. Lee statue is argued for on the basis of promoting a diverse society that does not honor figures associated with oppressive historical elements. The presence of such statues contradicts the values of inclusiveness and equality, and their removal symbolizes a commitment to equity and justice. Understanding and addressing the dissenting views is also crucial in making a case for the statue's removal.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the removal of the Robert E. Lee statue from public view, the argument must be clear and definite. It is important to present both the historical context of why the statue was erected and the cause-and-effect reasoning for its removal. The erection of such a statue is often tied to honoring a local historical figure, who, despite his military prominence, supported a societal structure that was sustained by slavery, which fundamentally contradicts the values of diversity and inclusiveness.
Arguments for the removal must be supported with reasoning and evidence. The promotion of a diverse society means not glorifying figures that represent divisive and suppressive historical elements. By removing the statue, a community conveys its commitment to equity and justice for all citizens, thereby promoting solidarity and ending any negative publicity relating to the figure represented by the statue.
To recognize dissenting views, it is necessary to understand that some may view the statue as a piece of history or heritage, but it is also critical to explain how a public symbol can reinforce divisive ideals and thus be at odds with the principles of equality and unity. Therefore, being both anti-racist and inclusive is essential in the rewriting and representation of history within our public spaces, promoting an environment that respects a diverse and equitable society for everyone.