Question

Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law. How would English Enlightenment John Locker feel about the article?

A) He would disapprove of it because it calls for limited individual freedom.
B) He would approve of it because it appeals to the idea of natural law.
C) He would approve of it because it supports unlimited individual freedom in all situations.
D) He would disapprove of it because it implies that humans are naturally bad

Answer 1

John Locke would approve of the article because it aligns with his philosophy of natural rights and their protection through laws, a concept that he emphasizes in his Two Treatises of Government.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law" seems to align fundamentally with John Locke's idea of natural law and rights.

According to Locke, individuals have natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and the purpose of government is to protect these rights. Governments are formed through a social contract to preserve the natural law, which includes the right and duty to ensure no one harms another's life, health, liberty, or possessions.

Therefore, Locke would likely approve of the article because it appeals to the concept of natural rights and their protection through law, which is a cornerstone of his philosophy outlined in his Two Treatises of Government.