Final answer:
Filling every minute with activities is not an accurate measure of success. Quality of effort, productivity during work, and work-life balance are also crucial to defining success. Non-stop activity may even be counterproductive.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of packing every minute with activities as a measure of success is not necessarily true. Measures of success can vary greatly, and what may be crucial for one person might be irrelevant for another. For instance, the act of busyness does not equate to productivity or eventual success. According to some perspectives, any activity that does not contribute to ultimate success (true sustainability) is likely only contributing to failure, which could imply that quality and directed effort might be more valuable than the number of activities one engages in.
It's essential to consider the importance of rest as well; scheduling brief breaks throughout the day can lead to increased productivity and overall effectiveness, suggesting that non-stop activity could actually be counterproductive. Furthermore, considering other measures of productivity, such as the overall impact or value of one's work, rather than just the amount produced per hour, questions the premise that continuous activity is the best measure of success.
Finally, the balance between work and personal life is fundamental. Advice such as setting daily priorities, managing email only several times a day, and protecting private time by making a distinction between work and the rest of your life further demonstrate that success is not solely defined by constant activity but also by the efficient management and quality of the work done within the time we have available.