Final answer:
Ethical concerns regarding the increased use of electronic monitoring by the justice system include privacy rights, equality and fairness, and the balance between punishment and rehabilitation. The system should ensure minimal personal life intrusion, avoid disproportionate targeting or stigmatization, and not solely control individuals but also facilitate positive reintegration.
Step-by-step explanation:
Addressing Ethical Concerns with Electronic Monitoring in the Justice System
In response to the recent overhaul of bail procedures and the increased use of electronic monitoring, here are some talking points addressing three ethical concerns:
- Privacy Rights: Electronic monitoring raises an ethical concern about infringing on the privacy rights of individuals. While the goal is to prevent future crimes and ensure court appearance, the technology must be used in a way that minimally intrudes on one's personal life, adhering to legal standards of privacy.
- Equality and Fairness: Another concern is maintaining equality and fairness. Electronic monitoring devices should not disproportionately target or stigmatize certain groups and must be applied consistently to avoid any perception of bias or discriminatory practices within the justice system.
- Rehabilitation vs. Punishment: It is crucial to balance the elements of punishment and rehabilitation. While monitoring can deter criminal behavior, the justice system should also focus on rehabilitation and not solely use these devices as a means of control, allowing individuals the opportunity to positively reintegrate into society.
Policing and Race, the Eighth Amendment, and the potential value of other technological uses are also important considerations when discussing this topic.