Final answer:
Gerda Lerner's argument is that men and women have historically been recorded differently, with women largely absent from the narrative until much later. Evidence supporting this includes the lack of historical records mentioning women and the male-centric view of history. Evidence against this argument is the presence of female leaders like Hatshepsut in ancient Egypt and the Trung Sisters in Vietnam, who did receive historical recognition.
Step-by-step explanation:
The argument presented by Gerda Lerner in The Creation of Patriarchy suggests that men and women have had different engagements with history due to gender-based power differences, particularly in historic records and perceptions. To support this argument, two pieces of evidence from ancient civilizations could be discussed:
- The scarcity of historical records mentioning women leaders or prominent female figures from ancient times supports Lerner's claim. For example, women's roles in ancient Egypt were not typically highlighted in historical texts, with exceptions such as the Pharaoh Hatshepsut, whose achievements were often attributed to male predecessors or successors.
- The male-dominated narrative in historical texts, like those from ancient Greece, often neglected to provide a balanced view of women's contributions to society, reinforcing the notion that recorded history largely ignored women's experiences and roles.
However, evidence that undermines this argument includes:
- The existence of powerful female figures, such as the aforementioned Hatshepsut or the Trung Sisters in ancient Vietnam, which contradicts the generalization that all history for women was pre-History and shows some recognition of female leadership in the historical narrative.