Final answer:
James might view centrism as a barrier to liberatory politics because it typically neither challenges existing power structures vigorously nor promotes radical reforms necessary
Step-by-step explanation:
James might find centrism particularly nefarious for liberatory politics because centrism often seeks a balance between individual liberty and the needs of the broader community without strongly challenging existing power structures or advocating for sweeping reforms.
This approach can be seen as insufficient for those who argue for more radical change to address systemic inequalities and environmental concerns. Centrists might, for instance, balk at significant measures such as legalizing certain drugs or enforcing broad environmental regulations, which could be seen by progressives as necessary steps towards social, economic, and environmental justice.
Advocates of liberatory politics typically prioritize social equality and empowerment of marginalized communities, which often requires a more assertive governmental role in enacting policies to ensure equity, rectify historical injustices, and impose stricter environmental protections.
Centrist hesitance could thus be viewed as a hindrance to the progressive-moralist agenda that seeks transformative changes. This can lead to frustrations amongst those who see centrism as a barrier to achieving the desired depth and speed of progressive reforms.