Final answer:
The statement about bodies being thrown into mass graves without funeral rights is generally false. Historical evidence shows intentional burial practices and respect for the deceased, even during challenging times such as epidemics or after violent events.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'after all funeral rights were taken away, the bodies were thrown into mass graves in private' can be considered false. Historical evidence suggests that while there may have been variations in burial practices, especially during times of disease or violence, intentional burials with specific customs were often practiced. For example, archaeological findings show that burials adhered to certain orientations characteristic of Jewish ritual, suggesting that care was taken even under difficult circumstances. Furthermore, during the 20th century, the practice of family backyard cemeteries marked a different approach to burial, which later changed due to evolving societal norms and regulations.
In many historical contexts, including the examples provided from ancient times and during the chaotic periods following uprisings, the remains indicate that even though not all victims were buried instantly, attempts were made to observe burial customs and to maintain a semblance of dignity for the dead. For example, at the Tàrrega site, it is indicated that the Jewish burial traditions were observed to a certain extent, and communal graves were excavated with care by the survivors.
Thus, it is clear that throughout history, despite the challenges posed by diseases, attacks, or lack of immediate burials, many cultures strove to maintain burial practices and show respect for the deceased, contrary to the notion of indiscriminately throwing bodies into unmarked mass graves.