Final answer:
Ayi Kwei Armah and other African writers often find style discussions relegated in favor of content because post-colonial themes and cultural identity are prioritized, and external expectations emphasize African literature as windows into socio-political issues. This emphasis risks neglecting the richness of literary techniques and narrative structures that characterize such works.
Step-by-step explanation:
For Ayi Kwei Armah, discussions of style have often been pushed to the background in discussions of African literature because there has been a historical tendency to prioritize content, especially those dealing with post-colonial themes and cultural identity.
Armah, along with other African writers, might argue that the content of African literature—such as the struggle against colonialism, the quest for identity, and the socio-political issues facing African societies—has often been deemed so significant that it overshadows discussions of literary technique or stylistic innovation.
Furthermore, cultural expectations and external perceptions may contribute to the undervaluing of stylistic considerations in African literature.
From the perspective of certain critics and readers outside of Africa, there might exist an expectation for African literature to serve as a window into African struggles and experiences, thus making content the primary focus.
However, this has the counterproductive effect of reducing African literature to just its thematic elements, and risks neglecting the richness of literary devices, narrative structures, and stylistic choices that give the literature its unique voice and aesthetic value.
Ultimately, a holistic appreciation of African cultural production requires acknowledgment of both the powerful messages conveyed as well as the innovative styles employed by African authors.
The focus on content over style can be limiting and overlooks the complete artistic dimensions of the works.