23.7k views
4 votes
Which of the following statements is correct in regards to assigning oxidation numbers?

1) Alkali metals can have an oxidation number of either +1 or -1
2) Halogens can never have an oxidation number of -1
3) Oxygen must always have an oxidation number of -2, even in its elemental form
4) The oxidation number of alkaline earth metals in ionic compounds is always +2

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The correct statement regarding oxidation numbers is that the oxidation number of alkaline earth metals in ionic compounds is always +2. This is true for elements in the second column of the periodic table, such as magnesium in MgCl2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Correct Statement Regarding Oxidation Numbers

When considering the correct statement about assigning oxidation numbers, we must look at the rules and common oxidation states of elements. For the options given:

  1. Alkali metals in the first group/column of the periodic table usually have an oxidation number of +1, not -1.
  2. Halogens, particularly fluorine, have an oxidation number of -1 when in most compounds, unless they are combined with oxygen or other halogens, where they can have positive oxidation numbers.
  3. Oxygen in most compounds has an oxidation number of -2, but this can vary, such as in peroxides (O₂²-) where it is -1, or in compounds with fluorine where it can have positive values.
  4. The oxidation number of alkaline earth metals in ionic compounds is indeed always +2, making this the correct statement among the options provided.

Examples:

For instance, in MgCl2, magnesium, an alkaline earth metal, has an oxidation number of +2 while each chlorine atom has an oxidation number of -1. In its elemental form, magnesium would have an oxidation number of 0.

User Searock
by
8.1k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.