Final answer:
Craig views children in positions of power as a complex issue, covering aspects like the scrutiny of politicians who are parents, historical concerns about children's labor, and the potential influence young people could have in government roles. He acknowledges the debate while demonstrating awareness of the nuances involved in children and power dynamics.
Step-by-step explanation:
Craig's opinion on children in positions of power is multifaceted and can be assessed by evaluating different contexts in which young people, or those associated with children, participate in power dynamics.
Firstly, Craig establishes credibility by highlighting his own experiences, education, and involvement in community and parenting. He appears to be concerned with the qualifications and responsibilities of those in power, especially when considering cases like Sarah Palin's nomination, where her ability to serve effectively while managing family obligations, particularly regarding her children, was scrutinized.
Moreover, Craig reflects on historical concerns where children in factories raised fears about the future strength and intellect of citizens and soldiers, indicating that there has long been a debate about the balance between protecting children and taking advantage of their potential contributions to society.
There may also be an underlying recognition of the power young people could wield if they held government positions and the potential positive changes they might effect in their communities.
Finally, in societal and philosophical discourses, such as the satirical remark suggesting that children of the poor could be used to aid the commonwealth, or the debate on women's and children's rights, there is a tension between acknowledging their potential power and agency versus safeguarding their well-being and rights. These different perspectives show that Craig is aware of the complexity of having children, or the issues revolving around them, in positions of power.