Final answer:
The statement is an oversimplification of the opponent's clean energy stance and could indicate a straw man argument. Politicians might counter this with a pitch highlighting the importance of balancing energy needs with the transition to clean energy, addressing both economic and environmental concerns.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'He thinks we can solve all our environmental problems by having everyone in America drive a Prius' suggests a simplification of the opponent's position on clean energy solutions. In the context of a political debate, this could be considered a straw man argument - misrepresenting the opponent's stance to make it easier to attack. When facing an energy decline with traditional fossil fuels and considering the transition to renewable energy, politicians need to weigh the immediate costs against long-term benefits.
A politician opposing renewable infrastructure might pitch to the voters that such programs are too costly and aren't the silver bullet solution promised. They could emphasize the importance of energy independence and economic stability through traditional energy sources, all while developing measured and diverse approaches towards clean energy transition to ensure that immediate energy needs are met without compromising future generations.
Considering public opinion shows increasing support for climate change action and renewable energy, it's important that such a pitch also addresses environmental concerns credibly. Politicians might stress the need for innovation and improvements in existing energy consumption practices and suggest a gradual shift that benefits the economy while still moving towards lower emissions.