Final answer:
The idea that Jesus advocates going to court to settle disputes is false; he encouraged reconciliation and resolving issues outside of legal systems.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question regarding whether Jesus advocates going to court to settle our differences is false. In Christian teachings, especially within the context of Jesus's teachings in the Bible, there is an emphasis on reconciliation and settling matters personally rather than going to court.
For instance, in the Gospel of Matthew (5:25-26), Jesus advises settling matters quickly with adversaries, implying a preference for resolving disputes outside of court.
The overall message is one of forgiveness, understanding, and direct resolution rather than legal confrontation. Moreover, Jesus's teachings often focus on moral and spiritual matters, encouraging individuals to act with love and compassion rather than engaging in legal disputes.
When it comes to historical questions about peaceful solutions between nations, it's important to evaluate based on the specific context and policies of the leaders in question.
With regard to the claims made about Madison and Jefferson, the source provided indicates that the assertion 'Madison was much better than Jefferson at finding peaceful solutions for the problems with the British and French' is subjective and whether it is true or false can depend on the interpretation of historical events and policies during their respective presidencies.