Final answer:
According to Socratic philosophy, a good man cannot be truly harmed, either in life or in death, because moral character takes precedence over physical suffering. Such a view is paralleled in Christian traditions where a good life is dependent on one's spiritual state. Consequently, neither death nor adversity can erode the core virtue of a person living a morally sound life.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that 'no harm can come to a good man, either in life or in death,' originates from the philosophical ideas presented by Socrates. In his viewpoint, a good man's character—or soul—cannot be corrupted by external harm. Physical suffering, including death, is considered less significant than the harm caused by living a life of immorality or ignorance. Socrates emphasized that living in virtue is the paramount goal, and neither death nor misfortune could tarnish the soul of a virtuous individual. This concept is deeply rooted in the Socratic philosophy that a harm to one's character is the worst possible harm.
In Christianity, the concept of a 'good life' is often tied to the reconciliation with God and dealing with sin. The complexities of morality and its relation to divine command prompt intriguing discussions. Can morality exist independently of God, or is it entirely subject to divine will? Yet, in the perspective of someone dedicated to living in goodness, being aligned with higher principles suggests that even dire events such as death do not equate to true harm, emphasizing the importance of internal virtue over external circumstances.
For those who regard wisdom, compassion, and courage as the bedrock of morality, the idea of harm becomes a matter of righteousness, not just physical wellbeing. The philosophical question of 'What is a good life?' reminds us that the pursuit of a virtuous life is a timeless inquiry. Events like death are but waypoints in the broader context of living with integrity and righteousness.