Final answer:
Frederick Douglass maintained his commitment to the ideals of ultimate assimilation through self-assertion, differing from other Black leaders who either pursued compromise or supported Black nationalism. His advocacy for a "composite nation" involving all minorities, and his support for civil and educational advancement, set his methods apart from contemporaries.
Step-by-step explanation:
Frederick Douglass differed from his colleagues who favored Black nationalism in several ways. While some leaders after the Revolution of 1876 pursued new directions such as the conciliatory approach of Booker T. Washington, Douglass maintained his commitment to his early ideals of ultimate assimilation through self-assertion. Unlike the emerging voices that either leaned towards compromise or championed Black nationalism, Douglass stood firmly for the integration of African Americans into the fabric of American society without giving up their civil and political rights.
Further, in the grand scope of American history, Douglass's perspective was unique as he centered on the concept of a "composite nation," which valued diversity and condemned discrimination against all minorities, including Chinese immigrants. This view set him apart from some of his contemporaries who did not engage as directly with the broader issues affecting different racial groups.
Even within the sphere of education, leaders like W.E.B. Du Bois focused more on academic curriculum and the development of a talented tenth, while Douglass's narrative continued to support both civil rights and the educational advancement of African Americans. Therefore, his approach to civil rights and social justice was more encompassing, focusing on universal suffrage and equality rather than promoting a separate Black nation or accepting race-based compromises