Question

The venerable Judge thus ended what, the judge by his apparent emotion, and by the rears which filled his eyes, was really a painful task. The jury, according to his instructions, brought in a verdict of Guilty; and Robin Oig M'Combich, alias M'Gregor, was sentenced to death, and left for execution, which took place accordingly. He met his fate with great firmness, and acknowledged the justice of his sentence. But he repelled indignantly the observations of those who accused him of attacking an unarmed man. 'I give a life for the life I took,' he said, 'and what can I do more?'

Answer 1

Robin Oig M'Combich, alias M'Gregor, was found guilty by the jury, following the venerable Judge's instructions. He was sentenced to death and faced his fate with great firmness, acknowledging the justice of his sentence. Despite the gravity of his crime, he maintained that he gave a life for the life he took, vehemently rejecting accusations of attacking an unarmed man.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this poignant legal episode, the venerable Judge, guided by apparent emotion and tear-filled eyes, concluded a challenging task by instructing the jury to render a verdict of Guilty against Robin Oig M'Combich, also known as M'Gregor.

The subsequent death sentence, carried out accordingly, saw M'Combich meeting his fate with stoic acceptance and an acknowledgment of the justice behind the verdict. His principled defense rested on the moral calculus of giving a life in exchange for the one he took, underscoring a complex moral dilemma.

This case underscores the intricate interplay between justice and morality. The Judge's emotional demeanor suggests the weightiness of the decision, while M'Combich's acknowledgment of guilt is tempered by his conviction that his own life serves as an equitable recompense.

The tension lies in the subjective interpretation of justice, where the severity of the crime and the personal ethos of the condemned converge. As the legal machinery unfolds, it raises broader questions about the ethical dimensions of punishment, leaving the reader to grapple with the nuances of morality within the bounds of the law.