Question

There is no branch of work amongst the arts so free as that of fiction. Fiction authors imagine and distribute offensive expressions free of governmental censorship and interference. At the present time, they are under no legal duty or preliminary guarantee to exclude immorality from their stories. Their legal duty to the public or state appears to benil. This raises the question whether an author's freedom of expression is privileged? Is freedom of expression a fundamental component of what it is for people or fiction to be free? Are there any limitations to that freedom? On what grounds are the limitations made? An immoral fiction is one to which properties such as immoral are attributed. But can fiction be immoral? What justifies the censorship of immoral fiction? And is censorship sufficient in keeping the immoral fiction from the public? Potential limits on artistic freedom include (but are not limited to): Legal limitations: Laws very from nation to nation, state to state, and even from medium to medium. In some areas it is possible to legally buy literature which - if depicted in image/moving image form - would be illegal in the same jurisdiction. Given that our imaginations are powerful quasi-visual devices, this can seem a strange dichotomy, as can the fact that film is at base an authorial work, a script written for the screen.I'm not sure how you justify your claim that, Their [artists'] legal duty to the public or state appears to be nil. Try telling the team atCharlie Hebdothat, or the authors ofthese books, or these [film-makers] ( #Bahrain). See alsoBanned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Censor Books in Schools.Conscience/harm minimisation: When the artistic instinct is inhibited by potential consequences of realising the work; consequences which can effect not only the audience, but people who have never read the work, and of course, the author themselves.Imaginative/creative powers: An artist does not always possess the imagination and/or talent to realise their artistic ambition.Market demand/potential profitability: Transgressive works frequently cause sensation and sell very well, but others are banned or rejected by publishers/outlets.Fear of consequence: Societal/familial/peer group expectations and repercussions.Technical ability: EG: lack of sufficient skill to meet artistic aims.Motivation: The artist often desires the finished work but lacks the drive to see it through to completion. Can fiction be immoral? Fiction might be deemed as immoral/moral (although not necessarily) by those who adhere to consequentialism, supernaturalism, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, intuitivism, emotivism, hedonism, subjectivism, deontolgy (duty-based ethics). Each framework contains scope for an artistic work to be deemed 'unacceptable' from a moral standpoint (See the BBC'sIntroduction to Ethicsfor an explanation of each view. Upon reading each concise entry, it should become obvious how each morality might exert itself upon artistic work). People sometimes attribute morality to a work simply because itcontainsmaterial (such as depictions of sex and violence). Others might argue that depiction of such content is merely reflective of circumstances discoverable in the real world, and that for a work to be immoral, it mustadvocatefor behaviours that are deemed immoral. correct question format What is emphasized as a distinctive feature of the freedom within the arts, particularly in fiction?

a. Governmental censorship
b. Legal duties and guarantees
c. Freedom of expression
d. Preliminary obligations

Answer 1

Freedom of expression is the distinctive feature of freedom within the arts and fiction, allowing authors to create without direct governmental interference but not exempting them from legal consequences if content crosses certain societal and legal boundaries.

Step-by-step explanation:

The distinctive feature of freedom within the arts, particularly in fiction, is the freedom of expression. This involves the ability of authors to imagine and distribute their work without preliminary obligations or governmental censorship, although they may still be subject to legal consequences if their content is deemed obscene or harmful. Fiction writers exercise this freedom through their creative process, unbound by reality, giving rise to various genres and expressions of human existence.

This freedom, however, is not absolute and can be limited by factors such as societal standards, legal implications, and potential harmful effects to individuals and society as demonstrated by the Miller test and laws against threats and defamation.