Question

If A and B already have personal grudges but keep that aside, they are discussing a subject and a conflict erupts argument. Their points are based on the subject only and nothing personal but the heat of the argument is based on their personal enmity. this cannot be called Ad Hominem and it can't be called reverse/inverse Ad Hominem because it's different. So what do we call such a situation of an argument? In a discussion between A and B, who have personal grudges but set them aside during the conversation, a conflict erupts based on their personal enmity. However, the points raised in the argument are solely focused on the subject matter. What term best describes this situation?

A) Ad Hominem
B) Reverse Ad Hominem
C) Emotional Bias
D) Subjective Argumentation

Answer 1

The correct option is C) Emotional Bias.

The term that best describes a situation where two individuals with personal grudges argue on a subject but are influenced by their emotions towards each other is Emotional Bias. It is not an ad hominem attack, as the personal grudges do not direct the argument's content, but rather its intensity.

Step-by-step explanation:

The term that best describes a situation where two individuals, A and B, have personal grudges but stick to the subject matter during an argument, even though the heat of the argument is based on their personal enmity, is Emotional Bias. This is because, while their argument may be centered on the topic, the intensity and possibly the direction of the argument are influenced by their underlying emotions towards each other.

An ad hominem attack is a logical fallacy where the arguer attacks the person rather than their argument or position. In this case, since A and B's points are focused on the subject, it is not an ad hominem. A reverse ad hominem would imply that the person's attributes are used to support their argument rather than attack it, which is also not applicable here.

Subjective Argumentation would imply that the argument is based on personal opinions rather than facts, which isn't necessarily indicative of personal enmity affecting the tone of the discussion.