Final answer:
The question of why an omniscient God would consider murder wrong relates to the Euthyphro Dilemma and the Free Will Defense, challenging the compatibility of divine attributes with the existence of evil. It raises complex issues about the nature of morality, God's foreknowledge, and responsibility for evil in the world.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Problem of Evil and Divine Responsibility
The question of why a God, who is all-knowing and can look after the dead, would consider murder wrong, delves into deep philosophical and theological discussions regarding free will, the nature of good and evil, and the attributes of a deity. The essence of this dilemma can be traced back to the Euthyphro Dilemma, which questions whether something is good simply because God commands it, or if moral truths exist independently of God's will. If it's the former, morality could be seen as arbitrary, and if it's the latter, then God becomes an unnecessary middle-man for discerning moral truths.
Additionally, the Free Will Defense suggests that God permits evil as a consequence of granting creatures free will—a necessary component to avoid turning beings into automata. However, if God foreknows all possible choices and outcomes, the responsibility for the evil acts committed by humans, who were created by God with this foreknowledge, becomes a subject of debate. Is the deity responsible for human evil?
Moreover, if an all-knowing God allows for the birth and life of individuals destined to commit atrocities, it raises further questions about the deity's complicity in those actions. Yet, the argument that God uses evil for a greater good is challenged by the possibility of gratuitous evil that serves no discernible purpose or leads to any greater good. This possibility suggests that an all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful deity might be paradoxical if evil exists without leading to a greater good.