143k views
2 votes
In Kant's discussion of pure geometry in the Prolegomena, a potential contradiction arises regarding the nature of pure geometry. What is the apparent conflict, and how does Kant address it?

A. Kant asserts that pure geometry is both a priori and a posteriori, leading to a logical inconsistency.

B. Kant suggests that pure geometry relies solely on a priori intuitions, contradicting his mention of objects of the senses.

C. Kant posits that pure geometry has objective reality only under the condition of referring to objects of the senses, creating a tension between a priori and a posteriori elements.

D. Kant maintains that pure geometry is entirely independent of sensory experiences, dismissing any connection to objects of the senses.

User Steamrolla
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Kant's discussion of pure geometry in the Prolegomena reveals a potential contradiction. Pure geometry has objective reality under the condition of referring to objects of the senses, but Kant also asserts that it is independent of sensory experiences.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Kant's discussion of pure geometry in the Prolegomena, a potential contradiction arises regarding the nature of pure geometry. Kant posits that pure geometry has objective reality only under the condition of referring to objects of the senses, creating a tension between a priori and a posteriori elements. However, Kant maintains that pure geometry is entirely independent of sensory experiences, dismissing any connection to objects of the senses.