Final answer:
Scientific realism is not an example of the fallacy of the converse because it does not involve deriving values from facts about the world.
Step-by-step explanation:
Scientific realism is not an example of the fallacy of the converse because it is not based on deriving values from facts about the world. The fallacy of the converse occurs when one assumes that the truth of a consequent statement implies the truth of its antecedent.
On the other hand, scientific realism is a philosophical position that asserts that scientific theories aim to provide an accurate description of the world and that scientific entities, such as atoms and electrons, exist independently of our observations or beliefs.