Question

In the postcolony, wherein a particular form of power rages, wherein the dominant and the subjugated are specifically linked in one and the same bundle of desire, enthusiasm for the end is often expressed in the language of the religious. One reason why is that the postcolony is a relatively specific form of capture and emasculation of the desire for revolt and the will to struggle. Society’s energies are reinvested not necessarily in work, profit-seeking, or the recapitulation of the world and its renewal, but in a sort of unmediated, immediate enjoyment, which is simultaneously empty of enjoyment and a libidinal sort of predation—all things that explain both the absence of revolutionary transformation and the established regimes’ lack of hegemony.

How is this citation from Achille Mbembe's Necropolitics (pp. 29-30) related to Deleuze's analysis of desiring-machines in his Anti-Oedipus?

Answer 1

Achille Mbembe's concept of necropolitics in 'Necropolitics' and Deleuze's analysis of desiring-machines in 'Anti-Oedipus' both explore the operation of power in postcolonial societies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Achille Mbembe's concept of necropolitics, as discussed in his work 'Necropolitics,' is related to Deleuze's analysis of desiring-machines in his book 'Anti-Oedipus' in terms of how power operates in postcolonial societies.

In 'Necropolitics,' Mbembe explores the power of death, specifically the government's ability to determine who lives and who dies. This power is a form of control that is intertwined with desire and enthusiasm for the end.

Similarly, Deleuze's analysis of desiring-machines in 'Anti-Oedipus' examines how desire operates as a productive force within societies, shaping political and social structures.