33.3k views
2 votes
Fitch-style proof C ∨ E , A ∨ M , A → ¬C , ¬S ∧ ¬M ⊢ E

User Feronovak
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The question involves a Fitch-style proof in propositional logic, using given premises to deduce that E is true. The logical proof utilizes rules of inference to systematically determine that the premises entail the conclusion that E must be true.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question presented is a logical argument within the realm of philosophy known as a Fitch-style proof. This type of proof is used in propositional logic to determine the validity of a conclusion based on a given set of premises. We are asked to deduce that E is true given the premises: C ∨ E, A ∨ M, A → ¬C, and ¬S ∧ ¬M.

To approach this proof, we must use the rules of logical inference. Since we have ¬S ∧ ¬M, we know immediately that ¬M is true. Because A ∨ M is also true and ¬M is established, it must mean that A is true. With A → ¬C in our premises and establishing that A is true, we can infer that ¬C must also be true. Now, return to premise C ∨ E. Since we've found ¬C to be true, it must mean that E is the only remaining truth value in this disjunction. Therefore, E must be valid based on these premises, and we've completed the proof.

User Muntasir
by
8.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.